bubbleblower 9:55 Tue Nov 15
Deeney or Sturridge
|
|
We are rumoured on BBC Gossip to be interested in both.
Good additions or desperation buys?
|
|
|
Replies - In Chronological Order ( Show Newest Messages First)
collyrob
9:57 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
Sturridge would be an unbelievable signing for us.
Top drawer
|
cholo
9:57 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
Didn't Watford turn down £20m+ for Deeney from Leicester in the summer or was that story bollocks?
|
Johnson
10:04 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
We'll go for neither. HTH
|
Troy McClure
2:36 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
Deeney defo
Sturbridge is a injury prone, chicken livered, waster with no fight in his belly and a fucking shit goal celebration. Thanks for reading.
|
penners28
2:38 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
Rather we got the MARQUEE striker we were promised in the summer instead..
|
young woody
2:39 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
Sturridge for me.
|
On The Ball
2:40 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
Sturridge is by far the better player, but he's injured more than WHO.
|
Kelly Smunt
2:44 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
I think you misheard - it didn't say we are interested in Deeney or Sturridge, it said DEAN Sturridge (still better than Calleri or Zaza though)
|
Trevor B
2:46 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
penners
what promise was this?
|
Charoo
2:48 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
If you keep the players who can put the balls in the right areas then Sturbridge, he plays on the shoulder and is woeful and with his back to goal.
He is also injury prone and would probably die with him 3 3 weeks of being with us.
Deeney is decent and will bully defenders, be more up for a fight, can play back to goal but he's not yh prolific goalscorer we need.
I estimate that neither will happen with only a last minute desperation loan attempt for Sturridge on deadline day when we haven't secured another of our big name attempts.
|
Far Cough
2:48 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
Deeney for me please
|
Sven Roeder
2:48 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
Deeney's shorts look like they are made out of a MARQUEE
Is that good enough?
|
,
2:48 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
Once we get Sakho and Carroll fit and banging them in we won't need replacements.
|
1964
2:49 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
Carlton anyone?
|
Hani
2:50 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
Sturridge is another level compared to Deeney.
|
icwhs
2:56 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
We did try to get the Marquee signing in the summer.
We offered Bacca silly money, he wouldn't come.
Lacazette, we offered more money than anyone else, was still a no.
Batshuayi turned us down for Chelsea, we even sniffed at Ibrahimović but he was only going to United.
Strange people still bat on about not getting the marquee signing, but yet we no we tried??
I would have chucked a bucket of money at Hernandez, but who says we didn't try him either,
|
B6NY B
3:19 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
The BOARD will make noise, then Carroll will return in JAN and be hailed as a NEW SIGNING and we will end up with FUCK ALL.
|
Trevor B
3:21 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
icwhs
The problem is mate that for some reason many fans think we were 'promised' a marquee signing, even though nothing of the sort happened.
|
Sven Roeder
3:27 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
Am sure someone will pull out some Sullivan quotes about his plans.
Didn't Sahko get the hump because we were talking about BETTER strikers? And Carroll was tweeting that HE was going to be the 20 goal striker that the club were talking of getting.
Have no inside information but sure I heard Sturridge was keen to move back to civilisation which would put us in the picture. And Stoke out of it.
|
B6NY B
3:30 Tue Nov 15
Re: Deeney or Sturridge
|
They had my support until they mentioned Charlie AUSTIN, for no fucking reason, after he went Southampton. Why bring him up and criticise him?
Fucking comical and made them look like slimy non-west ham cowboy wankers they are.
|
| 
